# Pageworks vs. Pitch: choose by handoff, not by screenshots · Working brief

Fill this brief with your own material. The reference examples below are starting points, not your approved data.

## Your inputs

Field | Your notes
--- | ---
Audience | ____________________
Required outcome and recipient edits | ____________________
Products and plans to compare | ____________________
Total cost for the required period | ____________________
Source and reporting period | ____________________
Review owner | ____________________
Open question | ____________________

## Your action checklist

- [ ] Write down who drafts, who approves and who edits the final file.
- [ ] Use the same client brief and note the plan needed for each required feature.
- [ ] Open the export in the recipient’s actual software and check text, charts and notes.
- [ ] Inspect the first draft before correcting it. Count unsupported claims and missing source qualifications separately from visual issues.
- [ ] Perform the same recipient edit in both exports. Keep screenshots and the files so another reviewer can repeat the check.
- [ ] Choose by the requirements that matter to your team. Keep generation time, active correction time and total subscription commitment separate.

## Reference from the guide

Workflow question | Alternative | Pageworks
--- | --- | ---
Where does the work happen? | Pitch emphasizes team collaboration and sharing in its workspace. | A separate browser workspace, from source material through outline and editing.
What should the trial prove? | Test review and recipient access, then the separate file-export requirement on your chosen plan. | Up to 50 slides in Pro; test the needed edits in its PowerPoint export, including complex elements.

[Pitch](https://pitch.com/pricing)

[Pitch: product and import options](https://pitch.com/)

[Read the full guide](https://pageworks.app/blog/pageworks-vs-pitch-app)

[Create your presentation](https://pageworks.app/signup?next=%2Fupload&ui_lang=en)

[Pageworks](https://pageworks.app)